Rapport de presentation Retrieved from Ĭomune di Napoli. HAROPA achieves record container throughput at the Port of Le Havre. Geoforum, Vol.6, 247-262.ĬMcontainerManagement. (2017) Interview to Massimo Clemente/Interviewer: P. Napoli: Editoriale scientifica.Ĭlemente, M. “The City of Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Self-Evaluation Report”, OECD Reviews of Higher Education in Regional and City Development Retrieved from Ĭity of Rotterdam. (2019) Interview to Cyril Chedot/Interviewer: P. Sui Vantaggi della costruzione del porto di Napoli alla Riva dei Granili. Rivista Scientifica della Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica.Ĭervati, D. La governance dei sistemi infrastrutturali tra centralizzazione e decentramento: il caso della riforma portuale in Italia. The new governance structure of French seaports: an initial post-evaluation. Regional port authorities: leading players in innovation networks? Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 66–75.Ĭamera di commercio e industria di Napoli. Napoli: Edizioni Cronopio.Ĭahoon, S., Pateman, H., & Chen, S. Waterfronts: a new frontier for cities on water: International Centre Cities on Water.Ĭacciari, M. Catalogo della mostra (Venezia, 2006).īruttomesso, R., & Water, I. 10ª Mostra internazionale di architettura. 491-516): Blackwell Publishing Ltd.īruttomesso, R. Talley (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Maritime Economics (pp. Angeli, Trans.): Bompiani.īrault, E., Chilaud, F., Beaufils, M., Dinh, S., & Innocenti, C. Lo spazio, la storia, gli uomini, le tradizioni (E. Storia misura del mondo: Storica Paperbacks.īraudel, F. Le infrastrutture sono stupide – report del seminario Naples meets Rotterdam. Retrieved from īosso, P., & De Martino, P. “BLUE GATE ANTWERP WATER-BOUND SITE DEVELOPMENT IN METROPOLITAN AREAīopro (2017b). London: Hutchinson.īlue Gate Antwerp Development. The major Seaports of the United Kingdom. Riqualificazione dei porti italiani, lotte sociali e ruolo dello stato, 1945-1965. Naples: Grafica Elettronica srl.īettini, M. Italia: Laterza.īenjamin, W., & Lacis, A. (Ed.), Devolution, port governance and port performance (Vol. Port governance, devolution and the matching framework: a configuration theory approach. Avis délibéré de l’Autorité environnementale sur la requalification du quai de Southampton au Havre (76). Piano Operativo 2017-2019 con proiezione al 2020 Revisione anno 2018. Retrieved from Īutorità di Sistema Portuale del Mar Tirreno Centrale. Planifier, projeter, fixer les cadres de l’aménagement. Quartiers sud du Havre : réinventer l’interface ville-port. POUR DE NOUVELLES RENCONTRES EN PAYS DE CAUX. Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies, 12.Īssoporti. Urban systems and historical path-dependence. California: Standford University press.Īrthur, B. Whatley (Eds.), History Matters: Essays on Economic Growth, Technology, and Demographic change. Path dependence and competitive equilibrium. Retrieved from Īmirante, R., Bruni, F., & Santangelo, M. What can AIVP and the Port Center Network do for you?. The next step in your port-city relation. Territorio, Urbanismo, Sostenibilidad, Paisaje, Diseño urbano, 2-27.ĪgVespa. Port-city development in Rotterdam: a true love story. New York: McGraw-Hill.Īarts, M., Daamen, T., Huijs, M., & de Vries, W. Using and challenging the concept of path dependence-defined here as a resistance by institutions and people to change patterns of behavior and to repeat previous decisions and experiences-this PhD thesis argues that in order to overcome inertia, it is important to recognize the interests and spatial claims of all the stakeholders involved port city planning and to identify shared goals and values as a foundation for future design.Ī. This PhD thesis looks at the past as a resource, sometimes as a problem in the way it produces inertia, but certainly as a heritage made of signs, traces, and cultures, written and rewritten on the urban palimpsest. The separation between port and city in Naples originates from history. The different scopes of their planning are particularly visible in the areas at the intersection of land and water, where the relationship is characterized by waiting conditions across different dimensions and scales. Their diverse goals have led port and city to develop into separate entities, from a spatial, cultural, economic as well as administrative perspective. Each entity has different spatial claims and contrastive views on what port city integration can be. National and local authorities-namely central government, the Region, the Municipality of Naples, and the Port Authority-act upon the port at different scales, according to diverging interest and by using different planning tools. Numerous actors have been involved in the planning of the port and city of Naples. TU Delft, Architecture and the Built Environment
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |